Comments on: Do you consider Coach a luxury brand?

By: [L♫M&.Co.]

[L♫M&.Co.] — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:53:53 +0000

Not even. Coach is just overrated. If you ask me, the brands that are considered high end brands that are designer in every angle is brands like (only assuming their bags) Valentino, Hermes (I’ll bet you none of those woman can afford that), YSL, Balenciaga, Giambattista Valli.
The only reason those woman buy coach because it’s the only one they can buy (exclude cheap and ugly but real Gucci and LVs) without breaking the bank. They’re just the woman who wants to show off they have money but have enough brain to know that they gotta save some money.
I personally would just buy a vintage Hermes or a Valentino bag that’ll last me ages rather than buying whatever’s ‘in’ which is what those fashion victims do.
xx

By: міснзιιз♪

міснзιιз♪ — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:53:53 +0000

i think ur right… some of coach stuff are expensive..but not as expensive as michael kors, gucci, louis vuitton, etc…

By: Pri.

Pri. — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:53:53 +0000

i completely agree.
but not everybody can afford chanel, hermes, gucci, louis vitton.
so people wear coach.
and it’s not like coach is ugly or anything…

By: melissa

melissa — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:53:53 +0000

i agree with you.. you cant compare coach to chanel or louis vuitton.
i wouldnt say its a luxury brand.

By: jt<3

jt<3 — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:53:53 +0000

i agree. it doesn’t cost an arm and a leg to carry around a coach bag. they even have coach stores in a regular mall. just like how i don’t consider abercrombie or hollister to be anything high end.

By: irene z

irene z — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:53:53 +0000

i dont think coach is a luxury brand at all. its wayyyyy too overrated.