Do you consider Coach a luxury brand?

December 21, 2009 · Posted in Handbag FAQs 

I know you see them everywhere with the big C's all over the purses, their prices are "reasonable" compared to other luxury brands such as louis vuitton, chanel, or Gucci, but the question is does the name Coach even deserve to be in the same sentence as these other high end handbags? I personally would never be caught dead with a coach purse, don't get me wrong I have nothing against coach I honestly think their purses are cute and they also look nice on the 20 million people that I've seen carrying them, but to compare Coach to all those other brands i mentioned earlier it just kinda doesn't make sense right? I think coach is a luxury brand to a certain extent, given the fact thats it's not ridiculously expensive makes it affordable for the average person which puts the handbags in its own class, but my honest opinion is that it should never be compared to the likes of Chanel, Hermes, Louis Vuitton, etc. What is your opinion?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

6 Responses to “Do you consider Coach a luxury brand?”

  1. [L♫M&.Co.] on December 21st, 2009 10:53 pm

    Not even. Coach is just overrated. If you ask me, the brands that are considered high end brands that are designer in every angle is brands like (only assuming their bags) Valentino, Hermes (I’ll bet you none of those woman can afford that), YSL, Balenciaga, Giambattista Valli.
    The only reason those woman buy coach because it’s the only one they can buy (exclude cheap and ugly but real Gucci and LVs) without breaking the bank. They’re just the woman who wants to show off they have money but have enough brain to know that they gotta save some money.
    I personally would just buy a vintage Hermes or a Valentino bag that’ll last me ages rather than buying whatever’s ‘in’ which is what those fashion victims do.
    xx

  2. міснзιιз♪ on December 21st, 2009 10:53 pm

    i think ur right… some of coach stuff are expensive..but not as expensive as michael kors, gucci, louis vuitton, etc…

  3. Pri. on December 21st, 2009 10:53 pm

    i completely agree.
    but not everybody can afford chanel, hermes, gucci, louis vitton.
    so people wear coach.
    and it’s not like coach is ugly or anything…

  4. melissa on December 21st, 2009 10:53 pm

    i agree with you.. you cant compare coach to chanel or louis vuitton.
    i wouldnt say its a luxury brand.

  5. jt<3 on December 21st, 2009 10:53 pm

    i agree. it doesn’t cost an arm and a leg to carry around a coach bag. they even have coach stores in a regular mall. just like how i don’t consider abercrombie or hollister to be anything high end.

  6. irene z on December 21st, 2009 10:53 pm

    i dont think coach is a luxury brand at all. its wayyyyy too overrated.

Leave a Reply